Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-05-15 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is slightly better than the LG Velvet, with a overall score of 93.6 against 87.1. Galaxy S10 5G's construction has the same thickness than the LG Velvet, but it's a little heavier. The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than LG Velvet, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The LG Velvet features a better camera than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photos and videos in low-light environments and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a much bigger sensor shooting way better quality photos and a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
LG Velvet counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S10 5G features a bit better battery life than LG Velvet, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G costs more money than LG Velvet, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.