Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than LG Velvet, having a 95.4 score against 87.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than LG Velvet, it's thicker and incredibly heavier. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better looking display than LG Velvet, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
LG Velvet has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S22 Ultra's processor is just as good as LG Velvet's processing unit, and although the Galaxy S22 Ultra has more RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much better pictures and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality, a back camera with a lot better 108 MP resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has superior battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG Velvet. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy LG Velvet, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.