Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 264.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a score of 87.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 global score. The LG Velvet is an older and somewhat thicker phone than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but LG managed to build it just a little lighter anyway. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit better screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixel count in each screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636.
The LG Velvet features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG Velvet also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The LG Velvet features a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the LG Velvet also has a much more mega-pixels camera. The LG Velvet counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4300mAh battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.