Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | ZTE |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-15 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 264.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, with an 87.1 score against 78.1. LG Velvet is a just a little bit lighter cellphone than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but they are 0.31inches thick. LG Velvet and ZTE Axon 30 Ultra count with similar displays, although the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a little smaller screen, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a just a bit worse pixels count in each inch in the screen.
LG Velvet has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features just a bit better performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a slightly better camera than LG Velvet, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and video and a way better 7680x4320 video quality. ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a little better battery duration than LG Velvet, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
LG Velvet is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.