Compare phones
Kyocera Marbl
K132| Global Score | |
| 24.5 | 24.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Kyocera |
| -- | 2006-09-13 |
| 4.59 x 1.87 x 0.88 inches | 3.39 x 1.73 x 0.83 inches |
| 3.98 ounces | 3.28 ounces |
| $ 105.00 | $ 90.00 |
| 120 x 80 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 5 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 3.2 hours talk time | 180 hours standby time 3.7 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
Kyocera Marbl is just a bit better than the LG VX-2000, with a 24.5 score against 24.5. The Kyocera Marbl is a just a bit thinner and lighter cellphone than LG VX-2000. LG VX-2000 and Kyocera Marbl both feature very similar CPUs, both have 0 CPU cores. Kyocera Marbl features a much better display than LG VX-2000, because it has a higher resolution of 128 x 128 pixels.
The Kyocera Marbl's camera is just as good as the LG VX-2000 one. Kyocera Marbl has as much memory to install games and applications as the LG VX-2000. The Kyocera Marbl has a battery lifetime that is just as good as the battery duration in LG VX-2000.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Kyocera Marbl is also cheaper than the LG VX-2000.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.