Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 24.5 | 24.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | 2006-04-04 |
| 4.59 x 1.87 x 0.88 inches | 3.30 x 1.81 x 0.82 inches |
| 3.98 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| $ 105.00 | $ 75.00 |
| 120 x 80 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 2.8 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| CDMA | CDMA |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 850mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 120 hours standby time 3.2 hours talk time | 212 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.32 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola W315 has a score of 24.7, which is just a bit better than LG VX-2000's overall score of 24.5. The Motorola W315 body is noticeably lighter and a little thinner than the LG VX-2000. The Motorola W315 has a little sharper display than LG VX-2000, because it has a way higher 160 x 128 resolution.
The Motorola W315 features as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as LG VX-2000. The Motorola W315 has a processor that is very similar to LG VX-2000's processor, both of them have the same number of cores. LG VX-2000 counts with a bit better battery performance than Motorola W315, because it has a 6% greater battery size.
Motorola W315's camera is just as good as the LG VX-2000 one.
Motorola W315 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.