Search


Compare phones

Global Score
24.571.5
Basic Information
LGSamsung
--Android 4.0
--0000-00-00
4.59 x 1.87 x 0.88 inches5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches
3.98 ounces4.72 ounces
--Black, Blue, Brown and White
--Plastic
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 105.00$ 100.00
Display / Screen
--4.8 inches
120 x 80 pixels 720 x 1280 pixels (HD)
--Super AMOLED
--306 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
2.88.2
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset
processorKrait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor
--2 GB (500 MHz) RAM
GPUAdreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU
5.768.46
Storage
--32 GB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot
07.56
Camera
--8.00 MP + 1.90 MP
--f/2.60 aperture
--0.33 inches (1/3") sensor
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
08.47
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--Mobile Hotspot
CDMALTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA
--Micro SIM
0.15.6
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery2100mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
--Wireless Charging
120 hours standby time
3.2 hours talk time
200 hours standby time
15 hours talk time
2.44
Other Features
--Bluetooth 4.0
GPSGPS
--NFC
--Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a lot better than the LG VX-2000, having a 71.5 score against 24.5. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is a a lot thinner but heavier cellphone than LG VX-2000. Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a much faster CPU than LG VX-2000, because it has an extra GPU and a greater number of faster cores.

Galaxy S III Cricket has a much better screen than LG VX-2000, because it has a way better 1280 x 720 pixels resolution. The Galaxy S III Cricket features a greater camera than LG VX-2000. The Galaxy S III Cricket has a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than LG VX-2000, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 64 GB.

Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a way better battery duration than LG VX-2000, because it has 2100mAh of battery capacity instead of 900mAh.

In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is also cheaper, which makes it a simple decision.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.