Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than Google Pixel, getting a overall score of 91.2 against 80.2. Even though the LG Wing is notably newer than the Google Pixel, it is way heavier and incredibly thicker. Google Pixel has just a bit better looking display than LG Wing, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a quite better pixels quantity per screen inch.
The LG Wing has a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 4 GB more RAM. The LG Wing features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
LG Wing has a much better camera than Google Pixel, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG Wing also has a camera with lot more mega pixels, a bigger aperture, higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a way bigger sensor shooting way higher quality photos. The LG Wing counts with a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 44% greater battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the LG Wing, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Google Pixel, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.