Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than the Google Pixel 2 XL, getting a 91.2 score against 82.5. LG Wing's construction is a lot newer than Google Pixel 2 XL's, but it's a lot thicker and heavier. The LG Wing features a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a little sharper screen than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880px. The LG Wing counts with a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Wing takes way better videos and photos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have the same camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also has a lot more MP back camera, a lot larger sensor and faster video frame rates. LG Wing counts with a bit better battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 14% greater battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you want that extra features, you can buy LG Wing, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2 XL, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.