Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is better than Google Pixel 3's 80 general score. The LG Wing construction is newer, but noticeably heavier and much thicker than the Google Pixel 3. Google Pixel 3 counts with a bit better screen than LG Wing, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2160 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better display pixel density.
LG Wing counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 192 GB more internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The LG Wing features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Wing also has more RAM memory.
LG Wing features a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 37 percent bigger battery capacity. The LG Wing captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the LG Wing also has a camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution, a lot larger back camera sensor and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG Wing, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.