Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing is better than Google Pixel 3 XL, getting a 91.2 score against 80.7. Although LG Wing is newer than Google Pixel 3 XL, it's extremely thicker and noticeably heavier. The LG Wing has just a little better performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little bit better screen than LG Wing, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px. LG Wing counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Wing also has a back-facing camera with much more MP, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
LG Wing has a much greater storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. The LG Wing counts with just a little better battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3 XL. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.