Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is better than the Google Pixel 3a's 78.8 overall score. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the LG Wing has the older 10 version and Google Pixel 3a has Android 11 version. The LG Wing body is newer than the Google Pixel 3a's, but it is much heavier and thicker.
The LG Wing features a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2220 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel count in each inch in the screen.
LG Wing counts with a greater camera than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have the same video resolution and a same size aperture, the LG Wing also has a back camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution, a much larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and faster video frame rates.
LG Wing has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG Wing counts with improved battery duration than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3a, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Google Pixel 3a. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Google Pixel 3a, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.