Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, with a 91.2 score against 78.9. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS, but the LG Wing has the older 10 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11. Even though the LG Wing is newer than Google Pixel 3a XL, it is notably thicker and incredibly heavier.
The LG Wing counts with a bit superior processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM. LG Wing has a little bit better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a little bit inferior count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 and a little bit bigger display.
The LG Wing features a much better camera than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Wing also has a back camera with much more megapixels, faster video frame rates and a much larger sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality.
The LG Wing features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory. LG Wing counts with a bit superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG Wing, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.