Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than the Google Pixel 4, with a 91.2 score against 81.9. The LG Wing construction is newer than the Google Pixel 4's, but it is extremely heavier and way thicker. The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit faster CPU than LG Wing, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The Google Pixel 4 features a bit more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, it also counts with a quite greater pixel density. LG Wing has a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photos and video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also counts with a camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot higher quality photos and videos and faster 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The LG Wing has a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 192 GB more internal storage. LG Wing has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 4. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG Wing, else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel 4, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.