Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than Google Pixel 4 XL, with a general score of 91.2 against 82.9. Even though the LG Wing is newer than Google Pixel 4 XL, it is a lot thicker and incredibly heavier. Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit more powerful processing unit than LG Wing, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little bit better looking display than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. The LG Wing features a greater camera than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Wing also counts with better video frame rates, a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back camera with a much better resolution.
The LG Wing has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory. LG Wing has just a little bit longer battery performance than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 4 XL. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG Wing, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 4 XL, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.