Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is much better than Google Pixel 4a's global score of 82.9. Even being the best we are comparing here, LG Wing is a incredibly heavier and a lot thicker cellphone than the Google Pixel 4a. Both of these phones include Android OS, but LG Wing has older 10 version while Google Pixel 4a has Android 11.
LG Wing counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM. Google Pixel 4a has a slightly better display than LG Wing, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel density.
LG Wing has a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Wing captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the LG Wing also counts with a camera with way more MP, better 60 fps video frame rate and a way bigger back camera sensor.
The LG Wing features greater battery life than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3140mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 4a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4a. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Google Pixel 4a, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.