Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than HTC One M9, getting a 91.2 score against 77.7. LG Wing's body is way newer, but much heavier and thicker than the HTC One M9. These phones use Android OS, but the LG Wing has 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, providing some additional features and better performance.
HTC One M9 counts with a bit better CPU than LG Wing, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits processor. HTC One M9 has a better display than LG Wing, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels quantity per inch of screen.
The LG Wing features a very superior camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Wing also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a larger aperture, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos and faster video frame rate.
LG Wing counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG Wing features a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2840mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC One M9. If you want to save some money, you can buy HTC One M9, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.