Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than HTC U Ultra, having a score of 91.2 against 77. Although the LG Wing is incredibly newer than the HTC U Ultra, it is way heavier and much thicker. LG Wing has just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher number of faster cores and 4 GB more RAM.
HTC U Ultra counts with a little sharper screen than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixels count per display inch. The LG Wing features a lot better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video quality and the same aperture, the LG Wing also has a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, a way more megapixels back camera and faster video frame rate.
The LG Wing features a way bigger storage for applications and games than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal storage capacity. LG Wing features longer battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 33% greater battery capacity.
The LG Wing costs more money than HTC U Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.