Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than the HTC U11, with a 91.2 score against 77.6. The LG Wing body is much newer than HTC U11's, although it's incredibly thicker and a lot heavier. The HTC U11 features a bit better looking display than LG Wing, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a quite better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The LG Wing has a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than HTC U11, because it has 192 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Wing has a little bit better processing power than HTC U11, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG Wing features superior battery life than HTC U11, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The LG Wing takes a lot better photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the LG Wing also counts with faster video frame rate, a camera with a much better resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC U11, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HTC U11. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the HTC U11, giving up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.