Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is better than LG G8X ThinQ's general score of 82.7. These phones use the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. LG Wing's construction is newer than LG G8X ThinQ's, but it's extremely heavier and notably thicker.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit sharper screen than LG Wing, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels quantity per screen inch. The LG G8X ThinQ features a bit superior processing unit than LG Wing, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG Wing captures much better photos and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same video frame rate, the LG Wing also has a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a much more megapixels back camera.
LG Wing has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal storage capacity. LG G8X ThinQ's battery performance is very similar to LG Wing's battery life.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG G8X ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the LG Wing, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the LG G8X ThinQ, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.