Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than LG V30S ThinQ, with a 91.2 score against 82.5. Both phones in this review use Android OS, but LG Wing has older 10 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. LG Wing's body is a lot newer, but a lot thicker and way heavier than the LG V30S ThinQ. The LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better screen than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2880px resolution.
LG Wing counts with more memory to install applications and games than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal storage. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a processor that's just as good as the LG Wing one, and although the LG V30S ThinQ has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG Wing has improved battery duration than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. LG Wing counts with a very superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality, the LG Wing also counts with a lot better resolution back camera, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a much larger sensor capturing lot better quality photos.
LG Wing costs a bit more than LG V30S ThinQ, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.