Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than LG V35 ThinQ, with a overall score of 91.2 against 81.3. The LG Wing design is notably newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, although it's thicker and way heavier. LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better performance than LG Wing, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel number in each inch of display and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG Wing counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than LG V35 ThinQ, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has more internal memory.
LG Wing has improved battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh. The LG Wing shoots greater videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the LG Wing also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates, a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photographs.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the LG Wing, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.