Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than LG V40 ThinQ, getting a 91.2 score against 81.2. Although the LG Wing is newer than LG V40 ThinQ, it is notably thicker and heavier. Both phones we compare here work with the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't see any differences regarding that. LG V40 ThinQ features a bit sharper display than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The LG Wing has a much better memory to install applications and games than LG V40 ThinQ, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than LG Wing, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG Wing counts with longer battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 21 percent bigger battery size. The LG Wing takes way better pictures and videos than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also counts with a much better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back and a lot larger camera sensor.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG V40 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V40 ThinQ. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the LG Wing, else you can save some dollars and buy the LG V40 ThinQ, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.