Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is slightly better than LG Velvet, getting a score of 91.2 against 87.1. The LG Wing is a better device than LG Velvet, we must highlight that it's also a lot thicker and noticeably heavier. LG Wing and LG Velvet feature very similar displays, both of them have a screen of the same size, the same 1080 x 2460px resolution and a better number of pixels per inch of screen.
LG Wing counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for apps and games than LG Velvet, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has more internal memory. The LG Wing has just a little better hardware performance than LG Velvet, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Wing also has 2 GB more RAM.
LG Wing captures just a bit better pictures and videos than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also has better video frame rate, a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a bigger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
LG Velvet has a bit longer battery duration than LG Wing, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Velvet, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG Velvet. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the LG Wing, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG Velvet, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.