Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, with a global score of 91.2 against 83.4. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the LG Wing has the previous 10 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13 version. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, LG Wing is a notably older, way heavier and a lot thicker cellphone than Motorola Edge 40 Pro.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than LG Wing, although it has a little smaller display, a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little worse display pixel density. The LG Wing features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG Wing also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Wing has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than LG Wing, because it has a 15 percent more battery size. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro shoots slightly better pictures and videos than LG Wing, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola Edge 40 Pro also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality pictures and videos and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.