Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 overall score. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but the LG Wing has older 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14. Even being the best in this review, the LG Wing construction is notably older, incredibly thicker and noticeably heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra.
LG Wing counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more vivid display than LG Wing, although it has a little smaller screen, a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little worse pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra and LG Wing count with similar cameras, because although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot lower resolution back-facing camera and a worse video definition, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
The LG Wing has a better storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit better battery duration than LG Wing, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.