Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-10-15 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is much better than Moto Z Force's general score of 75.8. Although the LG Wing is much newer than Moto Z Force, it is way heavier and extremely thicker. These phones use Android operating system, but the LG Wing has the older 10 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
The LG Wing has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 4 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a slightly better looking screen than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity per inch in the display and a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
LG Wing features a way better camera than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Wing also has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and higher 60 fps video frame rates. The LG Wing features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
LG Wing has just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the LG Wing, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Moto Z Force, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.