Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's general score of 77.4. LG Wing's body is notably newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it is notably thicker and a lot heavier. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with just a bit better looking display than LG Wing, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The LG Wing features just a bit better performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM. The LG Wing features much more memory for games and applications than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has more internal memory.
The LG Wing captures much clearer videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Wing also has a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments, a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot more MP back facing camera.
The LG Wing features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2730mAh.
The LG Wing is more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.