Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is much better than Moto Z2 Play, with a 91.2 score against 77.4. The LG Wing design is extremely newer than the Moto Z2 Play's, although it is noticeably thicker and heavier. The LG Wing has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM memory.
The LG Wing features a little sharper screen than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bigger screen. The LG Wing has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
The LG Wing features improved battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery size. The LG Wing has a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking images and video in low light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the LG Wing also counts with a way better 64 megapixels resolution camera in the back and higher video frame rates.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z2 Play, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.