Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing is better than Moto Z3 Play, with a 91.2 score against 76.3. The LG Wing design is much newer than Moto Z3 Play's, although it is way heavier and thicker. LG Wing has a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Wing also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG Wing has a slightly better screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bit larger display. The LG Wing counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has more internal memory capacity.
The LG Wing counts with a way better camera than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Wing also counts with a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a much bigger sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality.
The LG Wing features longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG Wing costs a lot more than Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.