Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than the Motorola One Action, getting a 91.2 score against 78.5. LG Wing's body is newer than Motorola One Action's, although it's way heavier and somewhat thicker. LG Wing features a bit superior processor than Motorola One Action, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One Action counts with a little more vivid screen than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a just a little more pixels per screen inch. LG Wing has a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One Action, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG Wing has a bit better battery duration than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3500mAh. LG Wing shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same camera aperture, the LG Wing also has a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution camera and better video frame rate.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Action. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Motorola One Action, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.