Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting a global score of 91.2 against 79.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but LG Wing has older 10 version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version. LG Wing's design is newer, but noticeably heavier and thicker than Motorola One Hyper.
The LG Wing has a bit superior CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM memory. The LG Wing features a little sharper screen than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bit larger display.
LG Wing counts with a bit better camera than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a same resolution camera and the same (4K) video quality, the LG Wing also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and higher video frame rates. LG Wing has much more memory for games and applications than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a battery duration that is just as good as the LG Wing one.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola One Hyper. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola One Hyper, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.