Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is better than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G's 77.4 general score. Although it's the best phone in this review, the LG Wing body is noticeably older, thicker and extremely heavier than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the LG Wing has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14.
LG Wing has a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG Wing also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a bit more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little greater screen density.
LG Wing has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A15 5G, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The LG Wing shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the LG Wing also has a way better (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy A15 5G has better battery performance than LG Wing, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A15 5G. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy A15 5G, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.