Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing is better than the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, getting a 91.2 score against 79.9. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, we must tell that it is also a noticeably older, extremely thicker and incredibly heavier phone. Both of these phones include Android OS, but LG Wing has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a bit more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little more pixels per display inch. The LG Wing features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The LG Wing has a much faster processor than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG Wing captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Wing also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate, a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality.
Galaxy A25 5G features longer battery lifetime than LG Wing, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.