Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than the Galaxy A35 5G, getting a 91.2 score against 79.4. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but LG Wing has older 10 version and Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14. The LG Wing design is older, way thicker and heavier than Galaxy A35 5G. The Galaxy A35 5G features a little bit better looking display than LG Wing, although it has a bit worse pixel count in each screen inch, a quite smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340.
LG Wing has a very superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG Wing features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A35 5G counts with longer battery duration than LG Wing, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size. The LG Wing has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the LG Wing also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor, a camera with much more megapixels and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.