Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.75 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.61 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is way better than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s 75.8 general score. The LG Wing construction is incredibly newer than Galaxy A5 (2017)'s, but it is notably thicker and way heavier. LG Wing and Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) have really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017) has a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels per screen inch.
LG Wing has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Wing also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG Wing takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a larger aperture for better captures in poorly lited environments, a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
The LG Wing has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG Wing has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A5 (2017), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.