Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy A50's global score of 83.8. The LG Wing is a newer phone than Galaxy A50, although it's extremely heavier and noticeably thicker. Samsung Galaxy A50 and LG Wing count with really similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
LG Wing features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A50, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. LG Wing counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a battery lifetime that's just as good as the LG Wing one. LG Wing has a very superior camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light images and videos, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution, a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy A50. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy LG Wing, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy A50, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.