Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Prism cube black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is slightly better than Galaxy A51 5G, getting a 91.2 score against 90.8. LG Wing's construction is heavier and thicker than Galaxy A51 5G. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but LG Wing has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A51 5G has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G and LG Wing count with quite similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixels density.
The LG Wing has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has 2 GB more RAM. The LG Wing counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal storage.
The LG Wing captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the LG Wing also has faster video frame rates, a way more megapixels back camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a bit superior battery lifetime than LG Wing, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A51 5G, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A51 5G. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Galaxy A51 5G, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.