Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A52's 90.7 general score. LG Wing is a heavier and way thicker cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A52. LG Wing counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Wing also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 and LG Wing feature very similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater pixels number in each inch in the screen. LG Wing counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A52, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The LG Wing counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have a 0.59 inches back camera sensor, the same resolution camera in the back, the same video resolution and a F1.8 aperture, the LG Wing also has higher 60 fps video frame rates. The Samsung Galaxy A52 features a bit longer battery lifetime than LG Wing, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.