Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is just a bit better than the LG Wing, having a 91.3 score against 91.2. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and LG Wing has Android 10 version, giving lots of additional features and performance improvements. Galaxy A52 5G's body is incredibly lighter and much thinner than the LG Wing, even though they were only released 5 months apart.
LG Wing has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Wing also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a screen that is very similar to the display in LG Wing, because although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a bit smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch.
LG Wing features a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG Wing captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a 0.59 inches back-facing camera sensor, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same resolution back facing camera, the LG Wing also has higher video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has just a little bit longer battery performance than LG Wing, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.