Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A6's overall score of 75.8. LG Wing's construction is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy A6's, although it is notably thicker and a lot heavier. The LG Wing counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2460px, a better pixels density and a bigger display.
The LG Wing counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A6, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity. LG Wing has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG Wing also has more RAM memory.
LG Wing features a very superior camera than Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photos and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a way higher video resolution.
The LG Wing has better battery lifetime than Galaxy A6, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy A6. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A6, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.