Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-10-15 | -- |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha, with a 91.2 score against 76.3. The LG Wing body is notably thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy Alpha. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but the LG Wing has the older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version.
LG Wing features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (although they are slower) and more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Alpha features a little bit better display than LG Wing, although it has a really smaller screen, a little lower pixels density and a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720px.
The LG Wing features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Alpha, because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 224 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG Wing counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 115% more battery capacity.
LG Wing shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same video definition, the LG Wing also has higher video frame rate, a larger aperture and a camera in the back with much more MP.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy Alpha. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Alpha, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.