Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 395 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy F62's 88.1 general score. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but LG Wing has 10 version and Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version. The LG Wing is a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than Galaxy F62.
LG Wing has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because it has 2 GB more RAM and 4 more processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit more vivid screen than LG Wing, although it has a little smaller display, a quite worse pixel density and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The LG Wing captures slightly better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have a 0.59 inches sensor, a same size aperture, the same (4K) video quality and a back camera with a 64 MP resolution, the LG Wing also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rate. LG Wing counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy F62, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a really longer battery duration than LG Wing, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.