Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is much better than the Galaxy Note 5's global score of 79.3. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the LG Wing has a newer 10 version while Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version. Although LG Wing is extremely newer than the Galaxy Note 5, it's way thicker and extremely heavier.
LG Wing counts with a better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores. The Galaxy Note 5 counts with a more vivid screen than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a bit higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
LG Wing has a lot better camera than Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same video quality, the LG Wing also has a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, faster video frame rates and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The LG Wing counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory. LG Wing features better battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy Note 5, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy Note 5. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy Note 5, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.