Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's overall score of 80.4. The LG Wing design is a lot newer, but thicker and extremely heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a little sharper display than LG Wing, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per display inch.
LG Wing counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Wing also has more RAM. The LG Wing takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for taking photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the LG Wing also counts with a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos, a camera with much more mega pixels and faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The LG Wing has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 256 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG Wing has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3200mAh.
The LG Wing costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.