Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 89.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2022-01-11 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S21 FE's overall score of 89.1. Despite being the best in this comparison, LG Wing is an older, much thicker and notably heavier phone than the Galaxy S21 FE. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but LG Wing has the previous 10 version and Galaxy S21 FE has Android 11.
Galaxy S21 FE counts with a little faster CPU than LG Wing, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Galaxy S21 FE has a slightly better looking display than LG Wing, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher pixels number in each screen inch.
The LG Wing counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The LG Wing shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video resolution and the same video frame rates, the LG Wing also has a camera with a way higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit superior battery duration than LG Wing, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.