Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing has an overall score of 91.2, which is way better than Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. LG Wing is a newer phone than Galaxy S7 Active, although it's much heavier and just a little thicker. The LG Wing features a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more processing cores and more RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 Active has a brighter screen than LG Wing, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel number in each inch in the display and a little bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. LG Wing counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a battery life that's very similar to the LG Wing one. LG Wing captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Wing also counts with faster 60 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.