Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is slightly better than Galaxy S9, getting a global score of 91.2 against 83.3. LG Wing's design is much newer, but notably thicker and way heavier than the Galaxy S9. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with just a bit better display than LG Wing, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
LG Wing features a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S9 counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG Wing, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The LG Wing captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and video in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the LG Wing also counts with a much larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
LG Wing features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S9. If you want to save some money, you can buy Galaxy S9, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.