Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a score of 91.2 against 80.1. These devices use Android OS, but the LG Wing has an older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though the LG Wing and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only a couple of months difference, LG Wing's body is a little bit heavier but notably thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro and LG Wing both count with similar CPUs, and although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid display than LG Wing, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel amount in each screen inch and a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The LG Wing counts with a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a back facing camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution and a much larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
LG Wing features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior battery life than LG Wing, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG Wing is also cheaper than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.