Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a general score of 91.2, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. Although it's the best cellphone in our current comparison, the LG Wing design is heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the LG Wing has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 version.
The LG Wing has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover Pro and LG Wing both count with very similar screens, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of display.
The LG Wing features a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 192 GB more internal storage and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little better battery performance than LG Wing, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
LG Wing features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs, a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher video resolution.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG Wing, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.